Current measuring technology topics - Join the conversation!

Testing double-sided optical elements with the MarSurf LD 260 Aspheric 3D

2019-01-18 | Products | Reilly, Karin
Measuring principle with double probe tip
Measuring station MarSurf LD 260 Aspheric 3D

In order to produce complex geometries such as aspheres, lens arrays, free forms and diffractive structures with high precision, manufacturing processes such as precision and injection molding as well as SPDT are used. Here, two separate mold halves are merged, which then create the finished lens. An integral part of such a procedure is the ability to record any errors highly dynamically.

Two factors are essential for precise production: on the one hand, the accuracy of the negative geometry that is brought into each mold half of the intended optical functional surface and on the other hand, the alignment of the two mold halves to each other. Any alignment errors of an optical lens manufactured in this manner result in a faulty position of the two opposing optical functional surfaces of the lens. However, the alignment of the two tool halves to each other can only be detected on the manufactured workpiece, the optical element. In optical production, manufacturing errors such as tilting and lateral offset are a general problem. The centering errors and their tolerances are precisely defined in DIN ISO 10110 Part 6.

Error potential during alignment and centering

In order to be able to determine the alignment of the optical axes of the two halves of the tool to one another before production, a third geometry, such as the cylinder edge, for example, is often used as a reference. The information about the optical axes of the individual optical surfaces is the basic requirement for being able to determine tilting and lateral offset (decentration). In contrast to spherical or planar optical surfaces, a bi-aspheric optical element already has two clearly defined optical axes from the two aspheric geometries themselves. Therefore, tolerancing of the tilt and the lateral offset to a third, external reference in the case of a bi-asphere is not necessary. The challenge is to find a metrological solution to capture the orientation of both optical surfaces in direct relation to each other. Not only can one draw conclusions about the quality of the produced lens, but also optimize the tools for the manufacturing process.

Error potential: if both surfaces have no direct relation to each other, centering errors quickly occur.
Here: Tilting error (left) and lateral offset error (right)


Measurement with double probe tip as a solution

Due to the increasing high metrological requirements for optical elements, Mahr application engineers have developed a measuring method, which allows a new approach to both the tolerability as well as the optical design. With this method, all relevant values can be recorded in one measurement, without having to resort to external references.

This solution was realized with the surface measuring device MarSurf LD 260 Aspheric 3D. The optical element, e.g. a bi-asphere, is supported by special receptacle with radial recesses. Via a probe arm with a double probe tip, measuring points can be recorded and evaluated on the optical element in parallel or polar offset. In the case of a bi-asphere, for example, this could be achieved with two measurements over the zenith of the optical functional surfaces at 0° and 90°. The measuring positions can be specified in the software and run automatically for subsequent measurements together with the associated evaluation.

Measurement with double probe tip: This patent pending method allows for a measurement without relying on an external reference. 


MarSurf LD 260 Aspheric 3D

The evaluation options are versatile and can be adapted to the needs of the individual. Typical evaluations on a bi-asphere include:

  • Evaluation of the difference between the individual optical surfaces P1 and P2 to their desired geometry – Difference profiles (PV, RMS)
  • Detection of the lateral offset (decentering) between the optical surfaces P1 and P2
  • Tilting between the optical surfaces P1 and P2
  • Center thickness of the optical element

This measurement solution means that both optical surfaces can be measured and evaluated in absolute terms without reclamping.

Measuring record: Specification of the parameters ​​PV, RMS etc. and their tolerance, specification of the lens center thickness in the 0° direction

How did you like this article?
Thank you for your feedback.
Add comment/rating